|
Fogo Island Process |
|
|
The Fogo Island Process
evolved from a series of events that took place on Fogo Island in 1967. Two
years before, Donald Snowden, the then Director of the Extension Department at
Memorial University, proposed the idea of producing a series of films to show
the people of Newfoundland and Labrador that poverty did not mean economic
deprivation, it could also be the result of isolation and the inability to
access information and communication through media as well as a lack of
communication.
Snowden
teamed up with Colin Low, a filmmaker with The National Film Board of Canada,
and considered five areas in Newfoundland for potential filming before deciding
Fogo Island was the ideal candidate to initiate what is now known as the Fogo
Island Process.
In 1967,
less than five thousand people lived on Fogo Island, living in ten separate
communities. Fogo Island represented the type of isolation and lack of
information or organization that Snowden wanted to show as alternate indicators
of poverty in the province.
Fogo Island
at that time was going through an economic slump. The Island depended on the
fishing industry for three hundred years, but the inshore fishery was failing,
and sixty percent of families were forced depend on welfare. These circumstances
brought about the possibility of resettlement.
Snowden
believed that the people of Fogo Island could form a co-operative in an effort
to preserve their way of life. Colin Low was introduced to Fred Earl, a Memorial
University Extension Worker, and attended a meeting of the newly formed
Improvement Committee, a group of members
formed from the ten communities across the Island. They introduced the concept
of filming on the Island, and identified a number of Island wide issues: the
inability to organize, the need for communication, the resentment felt towards
the idea of resettlement, and the anger toward the fact that the government
seemed to be making decisions about Fogo Island’s future with no community
consultation process.
By using the
technique of filming, communities as well as government officials were able to
see how the people of Fogo Island felt about the issues they faced concerning
the fishery. It was clearly identified that the government was making decisions
for Fogo Island without community consultation. This became an important part of
the Fogo Island Process, as individual communities were united in their
concern for their livelihood and for the future of Fogo Island.
As a result of the films, fishermen were given the opportunity to
voice their concerns to cabinet ministers and other government officials. Soon,
alternatives were made to the original proposal of resettlement, which was
initially pushed by Premier Joseph Smallwood.
Today, the
Fogo Island Co-operative is prospering. The Fogo Island Process is
only one factor in a success story for which most credit must be given to the
people. As film producer Colin Low said, the films "intensified" a process
already begun. The Fogo Island Process became an internationally
acclaimed prototype of using media to promote dialogue and social change and was
the model used by various communities in similar economic situations around the
world.